Search for: "People v. Padilla" Results 101 - 120 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
  On the other hand, while the court has been very hospitable to motions to vacate guilty pleas because of subsequent immigration consequences, that hospitality has declined despite the Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Marty Lederman
” The NDAA therefore leaves open, and does not affect, the unresolved questions raised in the Padilla and al-Marri cases–i.e., whether the AUMF authorizes the long-term military detention of U.S. citizens and lawful resident aliens who are apprehended in the United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:53 am by Danielle Beach-Oswald
  Although the Supreme Court ruled in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:32 am by Nathan
The issue was presented in two companion cases, Lafler v Cooper and Missouri v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:28 pm
While there is a plethora of information about how to "do it yourself" on the internet, California criminal defense attorneys sometimes encounter complicated scenarios that need cleaning up: multiple convictions, convictions needing to be set aside in the interest of justice, or claims that defendants were not advised of immigration consequences by their attorney priot to having entered the plea, in light of the SCOTUS's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:23 am by Ted Folkman
In post-9/11 decisions, the Sixth Circuit and , in Rusmfeld v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 11:39 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Tomasik, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals judgment and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with People v Stanaway, 446 Mich 643 (1994). [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:34 am
About a year ago, the United States Supreme Court held in Padilla v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
"  The accused, sheepishly, states in the affirmative.Last year, however, the SCOTUS decided Padilla v Kentucky. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 12:52 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
"  The accused, sheepishly, states in the affirmative.Last year, however, the SCOTUS decided Padilla v Kentucky. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm by Albert Wan
I have written extensively over the past year or so about the effects of a seminal Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:43 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
On January 25, 2011, the Michigan Court of Appeals published its opinion in People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm by Gideon
: On a similar note, Rick Horowitz writes today about freedom and why that’s not what’s killing people. [read post]