Search for: "People v. Page" Results 1 - 20 of 7,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2013, 12:58 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Last week, the California Appellate Court in a lengthy opinion (116 pages) overturned the murder conviction of Michael Pizarro (People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 2:40 pm by Stephen Gillers
Is anyone to blame (people will be blamed but that does not mean that they are to blame). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 10:21 am
  Some bluebooking errors; for example, on page 7, the citation to "(Birchfield v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:43 pm
There are some darn smart people on the California Supreme Court (and in their chambers).Take today's opinion, for example.  [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Page 3 1 (Crim Ct, Kings County, Cyrulnik, J.), quoting People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 10:03 am
My new and relatively brief (25 pages) essay, The People or the State? [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
And on that page, you'll see the name he uses on Skype which, like e-mail, is a way to correspond with people over the Internet.Azmadeuz. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
   According to the opinion, [m]ultiple people became `friends’ with the Facebook page at issue, allowing them to view comments and posts made on and from the Facebook page. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:41 pm by Jan
In order to “suppress” the page number on the caption page of a pleading, people commonly open the footer editing screen and apply the “Different First Page” option from the Header & Footer Tools tab. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Bussey Law Firm PC and Timothy Raymond Bussey v Jason Page (aka Jay Page) ([2015] EWHC 563 (QB)) a US lawyer and his firm were awarded libel damages of £50,000 for internet abuse by an individual in England. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 11:23 am
 The Court of Appeal says:"On page 4, near the end of the paragraph that started on page 3 with 'Appellants argue evidentiary error' delete the sentence 'For its part, the Attorney General offers this court no help, instead compounding the problem with a 458-page rambling respondent‟s brief plus 28-page addendum.'"Always a nice thing to have deleted (if it was initially said). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:52 pm
In three prior appeals, of which we took judicial notice, the same prosecutor was criticized for improper conduct, including the observation in People v. [read post]