Search for: "People v. Page"
Results 81 - 100
of 9,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2014, 11:21 am
” Many people objected to the page, but Facebook allegedly dragged its feet before eventually removing the page. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 6:05 pm
Albeit one that only criminal lawyers in California -- or those cognizant of this field -- would find interesting, or (potentially) even understand:If it ain't a wobbler, or at least a stealth wobbler, you can't knock it down to a misdemeanor.Read Justice Aronson's opinion for the nine-page version. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Want to see how to write a persuasive -- and important -- opinion in five double-spaced pages? [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:17 pm
Because it's the lowest form of juvenile humor, even though it was the only opinion published today by the California Court of Appeal, I promised myself I wasn't going to comment about the caption in this case.But then, on page four, I read this line by Justice Aaron: "Ralph saw Goodwillie put something down his pants. . . . [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:50 pm
The following introduction, from the top of page 3 of this opinion, sounds a little more like something you'd see in a work of fiction (or perhaps by Justice Kavanaugh) than in the statement of facts of a Court of Appeal opinion:"Lions was about to enjoy an afternoon beer outside . . . . [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:47 am
Oh my God.The first ten pages of this opinion tell the tales of two small children. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
Read this opinion -- or at least the first dozen pages or so -- and see whether you think the defendant:(A) Wouldn't have done the same thing but for his initial religious upbrining;(B) Wouldn't have done the same thing if he wouldn't have abandoned that upbringing;(C) A mix of both (A) and (B). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
Justice Wiley authors a lengthy opinion (for him) that discusses and applies 22 pages of legal doctrine. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 2:12 am
"Or, as the Court of Appeal says here, "On page 20, line 1, the first full sentence, the words 'the Court of Appeal' are changed to 'the Supreme Court.'" [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:48 am
I disagree with this one.It's a total shortie -- seven double-spaced pages. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 6:52 am
Case citation: Fyk v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:18 pm
But, thankfully, the California Court of Appeal has been picking up the slack.Including this 96-page missive by Justice Haller. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 12:23 pm
Read pages 4 through 12 of this opinion and see if you had the same reaction that I did.My reaction was an immensely palpable sense that even though I'm on the same planet (indeed, in the same country and even the same state) as every one of the participants, I nonetheless live in a totally -- completely -- different world. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 12:05 pm
You don't see many 82-page opinions by the California Court of Appeal in run-of-the-mill child molestation cases. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:40 am
Bevin Deleting Comments to County Facebook Page May Violate First Amendment–Davison v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:45 am
A California Supreme Court death penalty opinion that's only three dozen pages long?! [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
In People v. iMergent, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 20, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) upheld a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendants from violating the UCL and the Seller Assisted Marketing Plan ("SAMP") Act (Civ. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:06 am
This is not the longest death penalty opinion by the California Supreme Court (by far), and tops out at only 33 double-spaced pages. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:47 pm
Conclusion Press corporations use lurid and inaccurate front page articles/headlines to persuade people to buy their papers. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
People with disabilities which prevent them from holding or manipulating books, turning pages may have access to the full text of the books. [read post]
