Search for: "People v. Parker" Results 221 - 240 of 611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2016, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
(State legislatures, of course, can provide people with more protection than the Constitution requires.) [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
 Under EU law in force since May 2011, people must give their consent before an anti-ad-blocker script can run and hide content on a page. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There are exceptions to these rules, but it applies to most working people. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
But the Court’s 2009 decision, Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
Officer Parker tried to get behind the Sebring to conduct a traffic stop, but the Sebring sped onto the 118 Freeway with Officer Parker still in pursuit. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:17 pm by Walter Olson
Hans Bader of CEI, at Law and Liberty: As the Washington state supreme court noted in Rickert v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:05 am by SHG
  And for those who doubt the existence of karma, it came back to him the next day, when the United States Supreme Court affirmed his decision in Nebraska v. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:25 pm by Jeff Gamso
Heller in which he wrote the majority opinion and Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 2:49 am by Jeremy Saland
Rather, a defendant must aim “to permanently deprive the victim[] of the property” (People v Medina, 18 NY3d 98, 105 [2011]; see People v Jennings, 69 NY2d at 118; People v Jacobs, 52 AD3d 432, 433 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 833 [2008]; see also People v Parker, 121 AD3d 1190, 1191 [2014]). [read post]