Search for: "People v. Parker" Results 121 - 140 of 613
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by SHG
In the 1968 case Pickering v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
” Further, and importantly, as reported by the IPKAT, even in China, the Beijing internet Court in its decision in th case of Feilin v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm by Gordon Ahl, William Ford
Gerson; Kristy Parker, Counsel for Protect Democracy; GMU Professor Ilya Somin; and will be moderated by Lawfare Contributing Editor Carrie Cordero. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:56 pm by Will Baude
Fetishizing the text didn't matter so much in Parker, since it was a town of about 1000 people, but it will have profound impacts in Oklahoma. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:57 am by Howard Knopf
 This current Copyright Board “2.0” is the 1989 replacement for Canada’s then 53-year-old internationally admired and exemplary Copyright Appeal Board “1.0”, which  established in 1936 as a result of the legendary 1935 report of the Parker Commission.The Copyright Appeal Board consisted of a judge and two public servants, all of whom served part time. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
” Several weeks later, on July 18, Justice Elena Kagan appeared at Georgetown as well, where she recounted her memorable Kimble v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:01 am
., West Virginia Board of Education v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm by Robert Liles
This effectively opened the door for patients to readily participate in genetic testing without the fear of losing their insurance due to the presence of a preexisting illness or disease.[5] V. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm by John Floyd
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down   In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
Parker, the earlier precedent on which it is based), Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Anyway, it’s probably a non-starter of a suggestion, since there are very few if any people in Canada who are sufficiently expert lawyers or economists to fulfill this role and who would not already have too much baggage to carry and still be perceived as credible to all concerned.So, I expect that my fear – shared by others – that this gratuitous statutory  references to the “public interest” and a “competitive market” will become an excuse… [read post]