Search for: "People v. Partner (1986)"
Results 1 - 20
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2014, 4:34 am
In Batson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority [1986] 1 FLR 224, HL the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) held that a girl under 16 could validly consent to contraception “provided that she has sufficient understanding and intelligence to know what they involve“. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:35 am
” Maurer v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The Supreme Court established the standard determining competency to be executed in 1986, in Ford v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 10:21 am
On appeal, the Supreme Court, in Yasui v. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 11:22 am
In the 1986 case of Batson v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:23 am
”] From Rapp v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 2:15 pm
Dumas, 68 NY2d 729, 730 [1986]; People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:19 am
In the previous DiFranco v Pickard (427 Mich 32 (1986)) regime, there were only a handful of appeals of threshold motions. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:44 pm
Charron v. [read post]
16 May 2021, 7:59 am
And that can plunge your business partners and loved ones – often the very same people – into a legal mess. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:38 am
Ark. 1986). [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:54 am
Ct. 1986), to uphold an order granting a gay father partial custody of his children, but restricting him from visiting with his children in the presence of his same-sex partner. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 4:09 pm
The case of Serafin v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Download CRT v Barr. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
In Musacchio v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
“I can tell you that I have seen a lot of things in the last 50-plus years,” he said.Some of the experiences that stand out, he said, include not having a single minority on any of his juries from 1976 to 1986 because prosecutors used their preemptory strike to dismiss minority jurors – a practice now unconstitutional thanks in part to the Batson v. [read post]
