Search for: "People v. Pearson" Results 141 - 160 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Inco (formerly Pearson v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:18 am
If there is an IP licence, a liquidator might describe it as an onerous licence and disclaim it [says the IPKat, on a recent dispute involving this area, see Butters v BBC here]. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm by cdw
The California Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
Rachlinski and Jourden’s test indicated that rights protected by property rules tended to show a stronger endowment effect than those protected by liabilities.[12] The test which was measured by a “willingness to sell/buy” indicated that a property regime produced more people who were unwilling to sell than a liabilities regime produced.[13] Furthermore the difference between the willingness to buy under a property regime vs. a liabilities regime was almost… [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 5:04 pm by lawmrh
See DCCA Opinion No. 07-CV-872: Pearson v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:40 am by Walter Olson
Tags: AAJ, litigation lobby, politics Related posts Judean People’s Front v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Tunheim thinks it fair to say that no court system in the world offers as many people as easy access to as many documents as is offered by PACER. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:32 am by Susan Brenner
In response, Beatty pointed out that people can name a file anything they want and that some file names are inherently ambiguous. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 3:54 pm
But it's a great way to advance the paralegal profession, and to meet and work with a very diverse group of smart and talented people, as shown by the wide variety of legal employers listed above. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:41 am
" Latest Activity on National Correctio... - Â People v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 2:18 pm
People v Pearson, 1549, 2835/07, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8686; 2009 N.Y. [read post]