Search for: "People v. Penny" Results 301 - 320 of 391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Judge Laplante saw through the drug companies’ shell games and got it exactly right in Bartlett v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Every penny spent to influence law is a penny not spent to pay managers, hire workers, innovate, or make shareholders wealthy. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Every penny spent to influence law is a penny not spent to pay managers, hire workers, innovate, or make shareholders wealthy. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:39 am by Doug Cornelius
Title VII makes the SEC tell people about the JOBS Act. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 10:19 pm
Each state has different rules.In New York, as it happens, our highest court dealt with the subject this year in Bernstein v Penny Whistle Toys, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:59 am by Nicole Reustle
“If you're a parent and you buy a V-Tech toy, put in a fake address. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:55 am by NBlack
Last week, the New York Court of Appeals handed down its decision in People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:18 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
When the Supreme Court re-calibrated the fair use analysis to focus on transformativeness in Campbell v. [read post]