Search for: "People v. Penny" Results 321 - 340 of 387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 pm by HumaRashid
Men have it easy compared to women: they don’t have to ponder the great Pantsuit v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Scale it back, settle what was at issue; create new business models, but you can’t force people into them. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:19 pm by Eric Turkewitz
I know, I know, that sounds even dumber than the claim of being fired for being too sexy, but it’s true, he actually did make such claims as I wrote about a year ago: Empire State Building v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am by Mandelman
  I think most people either know this, or imagine it to be the case, so I won’t waste anymore time on this point. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:29 am by Steven M. Gursten
The blog covered the Michigan Supreme Court’s motion for reconsideration in McCormick v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:08 pm by Peter
., a company that claims it can help taxpayers get “pennies on the dollar” settlements with the IRS, has been accused of misleading it’s clients: A national company that claims it can help people in trouble with the Internal Revenue Service has been misleading its clients, charging [...] [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
”  Kerr analyzes the reply brief in one such case—City of Ontario v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by ToddHenderson
Every penny spent to influence law is a penny not spent to pay managers, hire workers, innovate, or make shareholders wealthy. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm by UChicagoLaw
  And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Every penny spent to influence law is a penny not spent to pay managers, hire workers, innovate, or make shareholders wealthy. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am by Editor
As she puts it in her bio, "I care very much about information technology and how it affects people's lives, but I'm concerned that legal policies and precedents are being very foolishly decided that are ultimately detrimental to society. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a post titled Dickens's 1842 Reading Tour: Launching the Copyright Question in Tempestuous Seas , Philip V. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
As we diligently researched the law and saved our pennies to hire experts, McNeese was taking a different approach. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 4:14 pm
During the "unreviewed" Q3 2009 10-Q conference call, an embittered Patrick Byrne expressed his utter contempt for Grant Thornton saying: I am dissing [is people on the scene] -- I mean, I think Grant Thornton -- we're not going to be exchanging Christmas cards. [read post]