Search for: "People v. Perez (1974)"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2014, 9:44 am
In 2012, the EEOC issued its much publicized decision in Macy v Holder. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
(Administrative Procedures Act (APA); National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); Tribal Consultation) Perez v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:13 am
Tornillo, 418 U.S. 241, 258 (1974); O’Handley v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
In 1974, he was elected Arizona Governor serving only 2 years before being appointed the U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
In the decision of the court in the case of McClendon v Rosetti in 1974, the Federal Judge had to determine who, the claimant or the Property Clerk, is obligated to initiate a lawsuit to regain or retain the property as the case may be. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:24 am
Perez, 63 A.D.2d 911 (1st Dept. 1978); People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
Department of Labor Secretary Tom Perez expressed that putting the client first is, “now the law,”[ix]while Senator Elizabeth Warren (D., Mass) proclaimed the rule a day in which the government was working, “for the people. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1276 (5th Cir. 1974) (applying Texas law). [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:16 am
The first revises the agency’s regulations at 41 60-300 that implement the provisions of the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 (VEVRAA) (and rescind the outdated regulations at 41 CFR Parts 60-250). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Tornillo (1974), which struck down a Florida right-to-reply statute (i.e., a must-carry law). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The suit alleges lawmakers never had the authority to amend the Political Reform Act of 1974 in such a significant way. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 75 (1954), to which we owe the motion court no special deference. [read post]
