Search for: "People v. Perez (1993)" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am by cassieq
Tom Perez: Senior Advisor to President Joe Biden (1961-present) “To me, the meaning of Hispanic Heritage Month is for people across the country to come together to celebrate how far we have come to support Latino families, while recognizing how far we still must go. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
First, the Perez Decision is in accord with First Department precedent. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Corp. (84 NY2d 488,492 [1994]) Russo v Nassau County Community Coll., 81 NY2d 690, 697 [1993]). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:43 am by Ben
Hilow directed a 1993 documentary Rajneeshpuram an Experiment to Provoke God. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Corp. (84 NY2d 488,492 [1994]) Matter of Russo v Nassau County Community Coll., 81 NY2d 690, 697 [1993]). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Sarmiento-Perez, 724 F.2d 898, 900 (11th Cir. 1984). [read post]