Search for: "People v. Perez (1996)"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2017, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court addressed that issue today in the context of probation violations in People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 11:28 am
" United States v.Tamayo, 80 F.3d 1514, 1518 (11th Cir. 1996). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am
Bringing a challenge to same-sex marriage to federal court in 2010 is a little like trying to get the federal courts to decide Lawrence in 1972 or Loving in 1948, immediately after California's decision in Perez v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:10 am
Valdez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
The case, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Appellate Court of Illinois – Fifth Division: People v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
In 1996, California voters passed Proposition 215, now codified as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
McClung, 379 U.S. 274 (1964) (Commerce power extended to application of anti-discrimination statute to a local restaurant that served almost purely local customers where its food was ordered in interstate commerce); Perez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App. 1996). [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
"EU rules require large companies and listed companies to publish regular reports on the social and environmental risks they face, and on how their activities impact people and the environment. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
Crim.App.1996). [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
FACTS Eva Cassidy was a popular singer and songwriter who died in 1996. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
FACTS Eva Cassidy was a popular singer and songwriter who died in 1996. [read post]
