Search for: "People v. Perkins"
Results 61 - 80
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2017, 3:15 pm
Perkins, 262 Mich. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm
Anna / W&C: On build v buy. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:43 pm
Holder by Cody Perkins, 65 Administrative Law Review 427 (Spring 2013). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 7:46 am
Either way, Facebook can’t win * Facebook downgrades viral spreaders of fake news: Our research shows that there is a tiny group of people on Facebook who routinely share vast amounts of public posts per day, effectively spamming people’s feeds. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Whistleblowers: 9th Circuit Says Dodd-Frank Protects Internal Reporters This Perkins Coie memo reviews the 9th Circuit’s recent decision in Somers v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am
Tam, drafted by attorneys at Perkins Coie LLP, supporting the government’s position. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:33 am
Sometimes, in the middle of an opinion, you read a paragraph that just makes everything else make sense.So when Justice Nicholson says, in the context of whether it was proper to conduct a joint trial of both of defendant's alleged crimes:"Second, neither case was more prejudicial than the other or unusually likely to inflame the jury. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 1:07 pm
Joshua Kaul is an attorney at Perkins Coie whose work focuses on voting-rights litigation. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:02 pm
I think that's why the question of Justice Ginsburg's recusal in a hypothetical Trump v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:21 am
Perkins v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:21 am
Perkins v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
(citing Perkins v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:02 am
Thus, the timing of the Perkins v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
Recently, in Perkins v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:15 pm
’ The email told recipients about a proposed class action settlement in Perkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:01 pm
LinkedIn lost an argument in the publicity rights case (Perkins v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(People v Perkins, 62 AD3d 1160, 1161 [3d Dept] [affirming defendant's conviction for Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second and Third Degrees; "Penal Law article 265 does not effect a complete ban on handguns and is, therefore, not a severe restriction' improperly infringing upon defendant's Second Amendment rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:36 pm
See also People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 6:03 am
” In Jacobs v. [read post]
