Search for: "People v. Perkins (1982)"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Perkins & Ronald N. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Perkins, 18 Ohio St.3d 193 (1985) (“[T]he ultimate or inevitable discovery exception acts to forgive the constitutional violation made in gaining the evidence . . . . [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 6:21 am
(citing Perkins v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:41 pm
Perkins & Ronald N. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:29 am
Under such a reading, it could be a crime for a newspaper to harshly criticize jurors' decisions, or for a "group of people who had gathered in a public space outside a courthouse to voice their dissatisfaction with a verdict in a high profile case," State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 5:59 am
” Perkins v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
See, for example, Perkins v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
When pasteurization started to become more mainstream early last century, some people were suspicious of the technology. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
