Search for: "People v. Peters" Results 101 - 120 of 2,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
Although at least 15 people have been sentenced for seditious conspiracy since the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
On 10 May 2023, the Court of Appeal (Peter Jackson, Males and Arnold LJJ) heard an appeal in the case of Stoute v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 It is with that in mind that I take this opportunity to let people know that I have posted a new discussion draft, "Chinese State-Owned Companies and Investment in Latin America and Europe. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Almost thirty years ago, Peter Edge published The Missionary’s Position After Kokkinakis v Greece: in Ossewaarde, the ECtHR returned to the matter… Background In Ossewaarde v Russia [2023] ECHR 225, Mr and Mrs Ossewaarde were US citizens living in Oryol, Russia, on a permanent residence permit. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023  Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The founders of the United States understood that “an ignorant people cannot remain a free people and that democracy cannot survive too much ignorance. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am by familoo
He had some pretty strong words about the decision of his predecessor Sir James Munby in a case called A v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 10:26 am by Kelly Fitzsimmons
Anderson and ColoradoTruckAccidents.com represented one of the seriously injured people who was directly in the trucker’s path. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
William Brewer, Sarah Rogers & Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors and I filed a petition earlier this month asking the Supreme Court Second Circuit to review the Second Circuit decision in NRA v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
Officer was entitled to qualified immunity on First Amendment claim relating to livestreaming of a traffic stop, but claim for Town’s policy against livestreaming may proceed Sharpe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]