Search for: "People v. Peterson" Results 41 - 60 of 187
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2014, 2:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Peterson v Corbin and Nalitt v City of New York that a preliminary criminal injunctive relief is a drastic remedy which will not be granted unless a clear right thereto is established under the law and the undisputed facts upon the moving papers, and the burden of showing an undisputed right rests upon the movant. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm by Simon Lester
Continuing with my occasional (although becoming somewhat frequent) posts on NAFTA Chapter 11 non-discrimination standards, there is a new decision to talk about: Merrill & Ring v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm by royblack
But the threat of violence will tip the balance, see Lozano v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm by GJEL Staff
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
"The Risk Assessment Guidelines developed by the Board expressly provide that youthful offender adjudications are to be treated as `crimes' for purposes of assessing the defendant's likelihood of re-offending and danger to public safety as held in People v Moore, People v Masters and People v Peterson. [read post]