Search for: "People v. Phelps"
Results 41 - 60
of 273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
The court considered the proximity in space and time to the workplace, the pressure for employees to attend, and the following facts: The majority of the people at each party were employees;The employer sponsored the initial party;It provided alcohol and encouraged employees to drink;The after-party was a continuation of the first party; andThe employer may have known about Walsh’s previous inappropriate behavior.Phelps v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
This office has decided not to file a brief in Snyder v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 1:16 pm
Phelps fame) in the DOMA case--which, he points out, does not actually cite to any provision of the Constitution. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am
That’s the important part about this case,” Phelps said. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Phelps. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:36 pm
Phelps). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:34 am
First in line, due to be heard on 6 October 2010, is the controversial case of Snyder v Phelps. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
One saw something of this line of reasoning in the following comment on a Catholic blog: “It was intended to state an opinion that hurt people. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
Phelps, 41 N.Y.2d 238, 243 (1977), “The purpose of usury laws, from time immemorial, has been to protect desperately poor people from the consequences of their own desperation. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
Cole of Manatt Phelps Phillips sent word of a Manatt client's recent victory in CKE Restaurant v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:43 am
” Well, on a scale of 1 to 10 for loathsome, Phelps gets a 12, but so do Neo-Nazis and some other people, and they’ve got First Amendment rights, too. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 9:13 am
Circuit Court of Appeals said the law balanced First Amendment rights and the rights of people who attend funerals, In Phelps-Roper v Ricketts, the appeals court’s three-judge panel said that the application of Nebraska Revised Statute 28-1320.01 was constitutional, in relation to the October 2011 funeral of a Navy Seal member protested by the church. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 11:57 am
Sometimes, as in Snyder v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Because people will be trampled to death. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
The Supreme Court’s ruling last week on Snyder v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:18 am
The first is that people who are provoked by words that they find exceptionally painful, and who react to the infliction of verbal pain by killing, are weak people -- people acting out of a kind of akrasia. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:28 am
Phelps, 41 N.Y.2d 238, 243 (1977), “The purpose of usury laws, from time immemorial, has been to protect desperately poor people from the consequences of their own desperation. [read post]
