Search for: "People v. Pope" Results 41 - 60 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2006, 5:54 pm
In a carnival-like atmosphere, with a "No Popery" banner strung across the town's main road, Pope Paul V, who reigned at the time of the plot, is burned in effigy. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:56 pm
 [7] Oculus asserts that it even if it is an NDA, it is invalid because a specific term in it was not defined properly. [8]Regardless, a legal question has been set in motion, and my guess is that Luckey signed that initial NDA—as most people do—without giving much thought to its long-term consequences.Unfortunately, an NDA may lie dormant for years, but can erupt with volcanic force the moment a dispute arises, as it did in Silicon Knights v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm by Simon Lester
Continuing with my occasional (although becoming somewhat frequent) posts on NAFTA Chapter 11 non-discrimination standards, there is a new decision to talk about: Merrill & Ring v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
But as Rutgers Professor of Law and Sidney Reitman Scholar James Gray Pope wrote persuasively in “Snubbed Landmark: Why United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am by Frank Cranmer
Mr Sewell was convicted of her rape and of indecently assaulting two other people in 2014. [read post]
” In a 2022 interview, Pope Francis declared “zero tolerance” for abuse and the priests that have partaken in it. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
 First there is the enthronement of a new Pope and the inauguration of a new Archbishop of Canterbury. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am by Kevin
Pope Benedict XVI, et al., filed in 2008 and bitching about the seizure of plaintiff's assets by Pope Clement V, a mere 701 years before. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
Ejaculating into a condom is likewise so sinful that Pope Benedict was not always comfortable recommending to people in the midst of an AIDS epidemic that they use condoms. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
If the Court wanted to go down the path of emphasizing subjective motivations, it would have decided Trump v. [read post]