Search for: "People v. Potter" Results 1 - 20 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
" Indeed, I'd go further: fans are much less likely to assert claims, because (1) by definition, they like the underlying work, and (2) they have much more reason to fear losing their own authorship status, see, e.g., Anderson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 11:00 pm
(Kennedy, but so has Potter if you think about it). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:05 am by David DePaolo
Nothing in real life actually prepares normal people for the implausibility of comp.A dentist in Nebraska and her insurance carrier found that out.Barbara Potter began her work as a dental hygienist for Patrick McCulla, DDS, around 1981. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:55 am by David Smith
Potter v Dyer [2011] EWCA Civ 1417This is another rather sad and complex case with a fairly convoluted set of facts. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 12:55 am by David Smith
Potter v Dyer [2011] EWCA Civ 1417This is another rather sad and complex case with a fairly convoluted set of facts. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
It’s true that this quote is indeed what Justice Stewart is famous for, but people generally miss the follow-up to the quote: Nine years later Stewart joined the dissent in Miller v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am by SHG
Potter Stewart wrote an opinion in the 1974 case of Geduldig v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
High times at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service [Luke Rosiak, Examiner via Jim Harper, Cato] 6th Circuit: In ruling company’s suit against union to be unfair labor practice, NLRB breezed past First Amendment issues [NLRB v. [read post]