Search for: "People v. Potter" Results 1 - 20 of 272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2024, 7:30 am by David Super
  We dismiss the persuadability of most of those that do not support us:  a “basket of deplorables”, bitter people who “cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them”, etc. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 11:56 am by Eugene Volokh
He described the role of the journalist this way in a short concurrence to a 1980 decision in the case of Houchins v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 8:10 am by Richard Hunt
We can start with a result that seems startling, the case of the emotional support parrots.(4) United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Fandom—Polychron (LoTR), Axanar (Star Trek), Harry Potter Lexicon. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Ralph Richard Banks, Standford Law, asks, Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It was the criminal theory itself that seemed crafted around the standard for obscenity famously described by Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
Professor of Law, and Faculty Co-Director, Stanford Criminal Justice Center Justice O’Connor took the seat of Justice Potter Stewart. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
Shortly after taking office, he had an opportunity to do that, with Justice Potter Stewart’s announcement in June 1981 that he would retire in early July. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
” That leaves any potential censorship based on the ridiculous standard which Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart advanced for pornography in the case of Jacobellis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
A key concept under the rule of law is that similarly situated people should be treated similarly. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
Thought For The Day I’ll bet this, though: in a hundred years, people will be writing a lot more dissertations on Harry Potter than on John Updike. [read post]