Search for: "People v. Potter"
Results 221 - 240
of 272
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2015, 6:40 am
Because the judge must also be fair to the other party and consider the needs of other people’s court proceedings, the judge may have to limit the time you have or ask you questions that help you get to the legal issues involved in your case. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
The case is Lawson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:17 pm
— author of the colorful opinion in Gustafson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Conversely, productive property owned or controlled by individuals, especially where that ownership is not under state control or direction, could be understood as a challenge to the unity of the people and a political threat. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
I suppose the initial audience is people who asked me questions at these sessions. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
” Like pornography in Justice Potter Stewart’s famous quip, are we expected to trust that states will know it when they see it? [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:30 am
Is there something about March 30 that breeds people who turn their blues into art?) [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
Potter Stewart’s 1959 confirmation hearing is a case in point. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am
He added: “The only people I think need privacy are people who do bad things. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
So, from Goodyear v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IP finance) Global - Patents Grasp for straws, drop the whole bundle: (Intellectual Property Directions) Made in China - A glimpse into the future of patent information: (Thomson Reuters Scientific) AIPPI Congress: USPTO, EPO, JPO directors speak on worldwide patent pendency: (Managing Intellectual Property) Eco-Patent Commons responds to critics: (Managing Intellectual Property) Ron Slusky: Five prescriptions for broader claims: (Patently-O), Key patent strategies for nanotechnology… [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 4:59 am
Campbell v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
" (Waller v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am
When you take issue with a belief or position, one argument you can employ is called reductio ad absurdum, which sounds like a Harry Potter spell but is actually the Latin phrase “reducing to absurdity. [read post]
