Search for: "People v. Potter"
Results 241 - 260
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 10:18 am
Music is a performing art: people buy tickets to see musicians. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:17 am
In the case of Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 5:02 pm
.* Some people will continue to believe in Santa Claus, a flat Earth and the Manchester Manifesto.I particularly love the second point. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 12:47 am
Shabahang, 484 Mich 156 (2009), and Potter v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:59 am
Shabahang, 484 Mich. 156 (2009) and Potter v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
US could be endangered by US v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:24 pm
Senior and former Chief Judge Schwartz may not necessarily know how to specifically define a "depraved mind", but like Potter Stewart ala pornography, he knows it when he sees it, and he minces no words in describing it in Bonilla v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
And wouldn't the test necessarily boil down to Justice Potter Stewart's famous statement in his concurrence to the 1964 obscenity case, Jacobellis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:19 am
In Blanch v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:04 pm
As former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart observed, "'[P]roperty does not have rights, only people do.'" (p. 254 [attorney Scott Bullock quoting Potter Stewart].)In other words, with eminent domain, it's about people, not property.Jeff Benedict's Little Pink House especially reveals and revels in the human drama surrounding the Kelo v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
Two Justices, Potter Stewart, and Hugo Black, filed dissents. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
As Harry Potter author J.K. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
" (Waller v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
When in response to the prosecutor's question, the main prosecution witness falsely testified that she had received no benefit for he testimony, the prosecutor did not correct this "misstatement" as required (see People v Novoa, 70 NY2d 490, 496-498; People v Hendricks, 2 AD3d 1450, 1451, lv denied 2 NY3d 762; People v Potter, 254 AD2d 831, 832).2. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:38 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:11 am
" Indeed, I'd go further: fans are much less likely to assert claims, because (1) by definition, they like the underlying work, and (2) they have much more reason to fear losing their own authorship status, see, e.g., Anderson v. [read post]
