Search for: "People v. Potter"
Results 21 - 40
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
Which people? [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
One of his more well-known opinions was in the obscenity case Jacobellis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Which light links Latin scholars with Harry Potter? [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am
In the matter of an application by James Hugh Allister and others for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Clifford Peoples for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 30th November – 1st December 2022 R (on the application of Day) v Shropshire Council, heard 7th December 2022. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 3:46 am
” Justice [Potter] Stewart Potter wrote in the Court’s majority opinion. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 1:32 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 2/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:03 am
In Evans v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The Minnesota Twin, Harry Blackmun, who would write Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
Justice Potter Stewart On June 28, 1971, this day in history, the Court issued its decision in Clay v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
Gary Potter – Eastern Kentucky University.). [read post]
2 May 2022, 11:30 am
[17] Meinhard v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 4:50 am
The Times conceded that it, by policy, refuses to publish “hate speech,” a phrase that remains undefined and smacks of Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of pornography from his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
Black people are resilient — we’ve created so much already. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Guest, where Justice Potter Stewart wrote for the majority:Although the Articles of Confederation provided that "the people of each State shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other State," that right finds no explicit mention in the Constitution. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 6:08 am
In Hogan v 1187938 B.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
King v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:17 pm
Justice Hoch's attempt to distinguish Potter just doesn't work. [read post]
