Search for: "People v. Potter" Results 41 - 60 of 302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am by Giles Peaker
Other people may be interested in some or all of them. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
"This is consistent with how Oracle to the Federal Circuit years ago, with its Harry Potter analogy, which was just genius. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Author Gary Arlen
  “When violence breaks out at what was a peaceful protest, the people involved may or may not be the same ones. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  If you misspell Harry Potter’s name—or put it in kanji—we’ve got you covered. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
The types of people appointed to the court have also changed. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
By 1961, his position had not changed, and he attempted to sway Justice Potter Stewart to his side while Baker v. [read post]