Search for: "People v. Potter" Results 141 - 160 of 301
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2011, 7:16 am by Steve Hall
What became known as the Baldus study was the centerpiece of the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 2:28 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:08 pm
 In 1976, Potter Stewart,  Lewis Powell, and Stevens jointly authored the plurality opinion in Gregg v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:50 pm by Jon
But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.Concurring, Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Change in use would matter—commercializing the Harry Potter Encyclopedia. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 10:31 am by John McFarland
People came from long distances to bathe in its waters. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  If you misspell Harry Potter’s name—or put it in kanji—we’ve got you covered. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:00 am by Emma Kent
Data is not available for 2020 and 2021. [11] Section 218 of the Act. [12] Wilkinson v Kitzinger (No 2) [2007] 1 FLR 295, per Sir Mark Potter P at [50]. [13] See paragraph 21(2)(d) of Schedule 5; paragraph 5(2)(d) of Schedule 6; and paragraph 10(3)(a) of Schedule 7. [14] GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108; IX v IY [2018] EWHC 3053 per Williams J at [68]; MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649. [15] Levin, I. (2004). [read post]