Search for: "People v. Price (1991)" Results 61 - 80 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am by Wolfgang Demino
A defendant in such an action may be entitled to an offset against the deficiency if the trial court determines that the fair market value of the property sold at foreclosure was greater than the foreclosure sales price. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Claire’s Boutiques, 949 F.2d 1482 (7th Cir. 1991), the court found that a small, 5-watt receiver (list price $130, or $231.71 in 2013 dollars), wired to two small ceiling-mounted speakers 5 to 35 feet away, was a “home-type” sytem. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm by Bruce Boyden
Claire’s Boutiques, 949 F.2d 1482 (7th Cir. 1991), the court found that a small, 5-watt receiver (list price $130, or $231.71 in 2013 dollars), wired to two small ceiling-mounted speakers 5 to 35 feet away, was a “home-type” sytem. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Claire’s Boutiques, 949 F.2d 1482 (7th Cir. 1991), the court found that a small, 5-watt receiver (list price $130, or $231.71 in 2013 dollars), wired to two small ceiling-mounted speakers 5 to 35 feet away, was a “home-type” sytem. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Getting less (no right to transfer, give to library) but being charged more.Value-based v. cost-based pricing. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am by Cory Doctorow
Below, we have set out examples of how DMCA 1201 -- and its Mexican equivalent -- is incompatible with human rights, including free expression, self-determination, the rights of people with disabilities, cybersecurity, education, and archiving; as well as the law's consequences for Mexico's national resiliency and economic competitiveness and food- and health-security. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
In such a transaction $10 would indicate A’s minimum sell price and B’s maximum buy price. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am by INFORRM
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Stinchcombe [1991] CanLII 45 (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 326; and, R. v. [read post]