Search for: "People v. Profit (1986)" Results 1 - 20 of 148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
An economic framework based on profit maximization often assumes that profits are owed primarily to the owners of capital. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am by Betty Lupinacci
Even if you are not a collector, most people are aware that baseball cards are big business. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:41 am by J
 *although given the decision in James v UK (1986) 8 EHRR 123 – Leasehold Reform Act 1968 compatible – and the more generous valuation basis, I doubt it. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
After having been authorised to use the Ferrari’s trade marks to carry out non-profitable activities for almost ten years, from 1986 the Club used the de facto trade mark "Ferrari Club Milano" although not being part of the official Ferrari Club network approved by Ferrari (and leaded by the Ferrari Club Italia). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
  As a result of the vague standards set out in the statute the courts have developed a test to determine whether a nonprofit hospital is entitled to tax exemption.[7]            The test was first articulated in Methodist Old Peoples Home v. [read post]