Search for: "People v. Profit (1986)" Results 1 - 20 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 5:22 am by Geoffrey Manne & Ben Sperry
” (Brooke Group (quoting yet another key Supreme Court antitrust error cost case, Matsushita (1986)). [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:04 am by Betty Lupinacci
Even if you are not a collector, most people are aware that baseball cards are big business. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:41 am by J
*although given the decision in James v UK (1986) 8 EHRR 123 – Leasehold Reform Act 1968 compatible – and the more generous valuation basis, I doubt it. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
After having been authorised to use the Ferrari’s trade marks to carry out non-profitable activities for almost ten years, from 1986 the Club used the de facto trade mark "Ferrari Club Milano" although not being part of the official Ferrari Club network approved by Ferrari (and leaded by the Ferrari Club Italia). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:00 am
  As a result of the vague standards set out in the statute the courts have developed a test to determine whether a nonprofit hospital is entitled to tax exemption.[7]            The test was first articulated in Methodist Old Peoples Home v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:00 am
DEFENDANT   Iowa Secretary of State shows J&M Displays is active with corporation number 11369 a domestic for profit corporation effectively October 8, 1986 in Yarmouth, Iowa. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:26 pm
Full story: Children & Young People Now.CASESYLA v PM & MZ [2013] EWHC 3622 (Fam) (20 November 2013)Court of Protection proceedings concerning a vulnerable adult, and care proceedings concerning her child. [read post]