Search for: "People v. Radcliff" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2009, 9:08 am by Indefensible
Hat tip to Simple Justice who had this nice post on the recent decision in People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:32 am by Andrew Trask
The trial court approved the settlement nonetheless, but on appeal, in Radcliffe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am by Maya Bergamasco
  The only woman member of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund’s legal team for many years, Motley helped litigate Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  It is curated by Mary Ziegler, UC Davis School of Law (Harvard Gazette).Randall Kennedy, HLS, interviewed on Walker v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
—, 144 S.Ct. 756 (March 15, 2024), considered with a companion case O’Connor-Radcliffe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am by Eric Goldman
The case relates to a shooting in the Milwaukee area that killed four people and wounded four others. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Orin Kerr: internal v. external perspectives. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At least since Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:01 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
This wasn't a close case.United Factory Furniture Corp. v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm by CPoplin
It’s a question that for most people exists more in theory than in practice. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
The judge, applied the accepted “classic test” for frustration given by Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham [1956] AC 696, 729: “frustration occurs whenever the law recognises that without default of either party a contractual obligation has become incapable of being performed because the circumstances in which performance is called for would make a thing radically different from that which was undertaken by the contract”. [read post]