Search for: "People v. Ramirez"
Results 1 - 20
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 1:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court decision in the case of Shinn v. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 9:54 am
The post Christina Swarns Exposes Risk of A Right to Fair Trial in New York Times on SCOTUS Case Shinn v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
Dueñas" -- which is ironic, as the opinion (which is actually People v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
So, yep, other people have used the same term. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
But one of the downsides is the obligation (sorta) to write 80-page law review articles that few people will ever read and that affect the world -- if at all -- only marginally. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 2:51 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 10:09 am
But some people. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:40 pm
I'm kinda agreeing with you on that one, Justice Ramirez. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:31 pm
” People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
That's . . . a lot.Justice Ramirez doesn't do all this simply for fun. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:01 am
Sheldon Roberts v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 2:49 pm
Trial court erred in dismissing re-sentencing petition for felony murder People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:08 pm
There are legions of cases that make crystal clear that even though the rule of lenity is supposed to be a cardinal principle of statutory interpretation in the criminal context, in practice, it's pretty much meaningless.Except in this case.A vice principal at a high school has sexual relations with a 14-year old student. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:25 pm
Before today, the police were generally only authorized to do those things that were actually spelled out in the court's warrant. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
There's the old saying that you shouldn't bring a knife to a gunfight. [read post]
29 May 2007, 8:41 pm
The case is Ramirez v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:43 am
Justice Ramirez writes the opinion. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 5:40 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:54 pm
Ramirez has argued that his search was unlawful, and the evidence resulting from the search must be suppressed under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine, as detailed in People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:54 pm
Ramirez has argued that his search was unlawful, and the evidence resulting from the search must be suppressed under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine, as detailed in People v. [read post]
