Search for: "People v. Ramsey"
Results 1 - 20
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2012, 6:01 pm
In Ramsey v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 8:32 pm
County of Ramsey 16-543 Issue: Whether due process allows governments to confiscate money from innocent people on the basis of an arrest and then force those people to prove that they are entitled to have their money returned. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
Ramsey [Lisa P. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:50 am
Last week in Matter of Phillips v Ramsey, 2007 NY Slip Op 06045, the Second Department held that a state trooper's personal copy of a police training manual does not constitute Brady material. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm
Here is the abstract: Concurring in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:01 am
Shannon Quadros wrote, in comments to Us v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:55 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Mickelson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Ashcroft and Golan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
Here's Ramsey: I was initially skeptical of the major questions doctrine (MQD), as deployed by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Ramsey [Lisa P. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:10 am
In Atheists for Human Rights v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
Tam (2017) and Iancu v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm
the court has no discretion; concurrent sentences are mandated' " (People v Roundtree, 75 AD3d 1136, 1138, lv denied 15 NY3d 855, quoting People v Hamilton, 4 NY3d 654, 658; see People v Cromwell, 71 AD3d 414, 415, lv denied 15 NY3d 803; People v Mercer, 66 AD3d 1368, 1370, lv denied 13 NY3d 940). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm
That just is not the way the people of that era thought. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
" U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:58 pm
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
