Search for: "People v. Redmond" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
Although I'm a little late to the party in writing about Redmond v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:58 pm by Business Law Post
Thus, in PepsiCo, Inc. v Redmond (54 F.3d 1262 (1995), Redmond worked in a senior position at PepsiCo in a highly competitive sport-drinks industry. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am by INFORRM
  As Lord Neuberger says: “It is true that the book contained material which some people might find offensive, in terms of what was described and how it was expressed, but “free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative provided it does not tend to provoke violence” – see Redmond-Bate v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:26 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Harris Using Links as Citations Helps Gizmodo Defeat a Defamation Claim–Redmond v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am by INFORRM
It isn’t just friendly, inoffensive speech that is protected: Sedley LJ’s statement (in Redmond-Bates v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789 that “freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having” was cited amongst others to this effect. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:38 am by Venkat
Schipperke people, you don't need that perk, as you already have my site to use for free. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:14 am by Wessen Jazrawi
This, together with the test laid down by Sedley LJ in Redmond-Bate v DPP [1999] EWHC Admin 733, led the Court of Appeal to conclude that the approach to be followed was an objective one and that it was not for the court to form its own view as to imminence. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm by John Borland
Some people somewhere had set their sights very broadly. [read post]