Search for: "People v. Reed" Results 201 - 220 of 632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2016, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
We owe it to the children, young people and families in our communities to address these issues before it’s too late. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
 Lord Reed refers to the position that EU law is the law of the land and the prerogative cannot be used to alter that. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
 He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am by David Post
.* * This case is a close cousin of the case (North Carolina v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
This week Christopher Booker, chose this as his topic for his Sunday Telegraph column “The terrifying tale of how Britain’s most secret court imprisoned a grandmother“. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Alex Loomis
Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman al Bahlul is a Yemeni citizen, currently held in Guantanamo Bay, who was convicted in a military commission under the 2006 Military Commissions Act for “inchoate conspiracy” to commit war crimes. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Which is entirely unconstitutional, says Erica Smith of the Institute for Justice, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 10:28 pm by Patricia Salkin
  Notably, however, the Court concluded that the subject ordinance was content-neutral under the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:30 am by SHG
At a minute before midnight, Northern District of Texas Judge Reed O’Connor issued a decision in U.S. v. [read post]