Search for: "People v. Reed" Results 261 - 280 of 805
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
 Lord Reed refers to the position that EU law is the law of the land and the prerogative cannot be used to alter that. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Elle Rothermich
Following Reed, Congress changed hundreds of laws that overtly classified people on the basis of sex. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:50 pm by Joel Welch
Reed Exhibitions is owned by Reed Elsevier who also owns Lexis Nexis, its legal publishing wing. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am by INFORRM
   Mr Jeremy Reed, counsel for the claimants in both actions, contended that the words “technical or commercial information” in the definition of “intellectual property” should be understood as if it read “protectable technical or commercial information”relying upon the House of Lords decision in Douglas v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
  People disregard adequate warnings all the time.So we fight the heeding presumption whenever it comes up. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:10 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the November 1 and November 8 conferences; relisted after the November 15, November 22 and December 6 conferences) Reed v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Sales. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
  At the IMLA Practice Blog, Matthew Schettenhelm covers yesterday’s grant in Reed v. [read post]
  Indeed, as Lord Reed said: “The time has…come when the courts should cease to use the inappropriate terminology of title and interest . . . [read post]