Search for: "People v. Reed"
Results 361 - 380
of 807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 7:30 am
(I've thought about these questions a lot, because Rostker v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:17 am
Take, for example, King v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
In last year, Sofa Works v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
.* * This case is a close cousin of the case (North Carolina v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:50 am
People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm
This week Christopher Booker, chose this as his topic for his Sunday Telegraph column “The terrifying tale of how Britain’s most secret court imprisoned a grandmother“. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 6:39 am
Ali Hamza Ahmad Suliman al Bahlul is a Yemeni citizen, currently held in Guantanamo Bay, who was convicted in a military commission under the 2006 Military Commissions Act for “inchoate conspiracy” to commit war crimes. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 2:19 pm
Few people pay taxes on such gifts. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:34 am
Which is entirely unconstitutional, says Erica Smith of the Institute for Justice, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
24 Sep 2016, 10:28 pm
Notably, however, the Court concluded that the subject ordinance was content-neutral under the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:30 am
At a minute before midnight, Northern District of Texas Judge Reed O’Connor issued a decision in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
More than 30,000 people entered immigration detention in 2015. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:28 am
The wait is over: a judgment has been issued in the Philippines v. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 11:12 am
I think most people would say that "the women" (or "these women") had allegedly failed to . . . . [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
Two weeks later, a new posting on the information-sharing site offered a teaser of actual records from 1,200 accounts, and provided a link for people interested in purchasing more. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:30 am
Jordan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:55 am
Jordan v. [read post]
