Search for: "People v. Reed" Results 141 - 160 of 652
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
It is, as Chief Justice John Marshall observed of the commerce power in McCulloch v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:41 am by Tyler Gillett
Whether the restriction at issue is content-based depends on how the Justices decide to apply the ruling in Reed v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 1:40 am
Lucy Reed casts her eye over the Sorting Out Separation hub, and is not impressed by what she sees. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 2:03 am
Says Lucy Reed in this post on Pink Tape.Case Comment – In the Matter of J (Children) [2013] UKSC 9"On 20 February 2013 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the matter of J (Children)." [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 3:37 am
    B v B - Which concerned a father's application for the summary return of his daughter to Lithuania. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm by Prof. Akhil Reed Amar, guest-blogging
Here is what I say about this precise topic in Chapter 4 of my new book, in my discussion of the landmark Warren Court opinion of New York Times v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:46 am by steve cornforth blog
Access to legal aid remains limited - https://atjf.org.uk/In the momentous case of  Unison v The Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 (the tribunal fees case)  Lord Reed explained why this is so important – “Courts exist in order to ensure that the laws made by Parliament, and the common law created by the courts themselves, are applied and enforced. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:42 am by Amanda Shanor
At stake in the first issue is how to interpret a key Supreme Court opinion from 2015: Reed v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
Yesterday’s Opinions The Justices also released opinions in three cases yesterday: Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:07 am
Full story: Children & Young People Now.CASESGB v RNB [2013] EWHC 414 (Fam) (27 February 2013)Appeal by mother against registration of a Romanian court order granting the care of the child to the father until proceedings in Romania were finalised. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm by Donald Thompson
However, the jury was entitled to credit some of [their] testimony while discounting other aspects' (Kuykendall, 43 AD3d at 495; see People v Reed, 40 NY2d 204, 208). [read post]