Search for: "People v. Render" Results 1 - 20 of 5,210
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am by Bill Amadeo
Alexander” decision that was rendered before the Michigan Court of Appeals (People v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 2:41 am by tracey
Places for People Homes Ltd v Sharples; A2 Dominion Homes Ltd v Godfrey [2011] EWCA Civ 813;  [2011] WLR (D)  233 “The provisions of the insolvency legislation did not fetter the power of the county court to make a possession order for non-payment of rent against a bankrupt assured tenant or an assured tenant protected by a debt relief order (“DRO”) made under Part 7A of the Insolvency Act 1986 (inserted by section 108(1) of and… [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 2:26 pm
As explained in the case for which it is named, People v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
Correia,First Assistant Wayne County Public DefenderThe Court of Appeals recently issued a decision on two consolidated cases (People v Brannon and People v Fernandez (2011 NY Slip Op 03676, _ NY3d _ [5/11/11) which set forth the level of knowledge a police officer must possess before, consistent with DeBour, he or she has reasonable suspicion to believe an individual possesses a gravity knife as opposed to a legal pocketknife.In People v… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
  He's not all there.But he knows it's not okay to kill people, and even the defense expert can only render a "soft" opinion on insanity, admitting that he was not able to say "100%" that defendant was insane. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:07 am
  Chester Turner is convicted of killing not one person, not two people, not three people, but ten people. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am by Frank Pasquale
Sebelius may be the undoing of the challenge in King v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Arnold (96 NY2d 358, 363) the Court of Appeals held that when a prospective juror makes a statement or statements that "cast serious doubt on [his or her] ability to render an impartial verdict" (People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 363), that prospective juror must be excused for cause unless he or she provides an "unequivocal assurance that [he or she] can set aside any bias and render an impartial verdict based on the… [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
The use of the word "'all,' in and of itself, does not render a warrant a general warrant," particularly, as here, the warrant "reasonably sought all documents with other people's names. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
  The Supreme Court, for example, has plenty of incredibly bright justices, and often renders well-crafted opinions with which I agree. [read post]