Search for: "People v. Reynolds" Results 161 - 180 of 387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2015, 7:50 am by David Gans
  The upshot would be, as in the pre-Reynolds v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am by Lyle Denniston
  That mandate originated in Reynolds v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Though the plan created districts roughly equal in total population, the appellants contend that it nevertheless contains “gross disparities in voters or potential voters,” and thereby runs afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s “one person, one vote” principle under Reynolds v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 3:05 am by Lyle Denniston
The Supreme Court made that broader equality a constitutional mandate in the 1964 decision in Reynolds v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [@ClarkHat on Twitter] “Kern County, a jurisdiction with a long unfortunate history of putting the wrong people in prison” [Radley Balko, Glenn Reynolds/USA Today on People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
People, 177 Colo. 306, 494 P.2d 97, (Colorado Supreme Court 1972). . . . [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  In TM: Reynolds Wrap v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm by Richard Hasen
To begin with, since the Supreme Court’s one-person, one-vote cases in the 1960s (including the Reynolds v. [read post]