Search for: "People v. Richardson" Results 121 - 140 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
Richardson v Midland Heart Limited High Court (Chancery) 12/11/2007, unreported, concerned a shared ownership lease taken out in 1995. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 12:08 pm
And teammates like Quentin Richardson and David Lee have come to Curry's defense. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am by INFORRM
For the respondents: Bruce McClintock SC and Matthew Richardson instructed by Mark O’Brien, Paul Svilans and Andrea Rejante of Johnson Winter & Slattery. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 727 F.2d 608 (6th Cir. 1984) (DES – back to UK); Lin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
And that is precisely what the Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 12:32 am
WESTCHESTER COUNTYCriminal PracticeProsecutors Show Good Faith Belief in Child Witness' Competence to Support Propriety of Verification People v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In the post-war South, white southern Democrats used felony disenfranchisement to deny those rights, invoking historical similarities between the legal statuses of slaves and convicts as justification.Today, according to a report by the Sentencing Project, nearly 40% of the 6.1 million people disenfranchised by a felony conviction are black.Despite the troubled association of felony disenfranchisement laws with racial discrimination, courts, like the 2002 Florida court, generally have… [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:00 am by Guest Blogger
Richardson, for requiring classifications based on sex to withstand strict scrutiny; the year before the Court had ruled in Eisenstadt v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 12:14 am
Realty LLC NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Information Lacked Sufficient Allegations Defendant Knowingly Committed Falsely Reporting an Incident People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 12:30 pm
We feel uncomfortable coming right out and saying publicly, The People sometimes seem awfully stupid. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
But the Court has already given up on the desire to maintain public-private parallelism: in the § 1983 context, Richardson v. [read post]