Search for: "People v. Riley" Results 201 - 220 of 454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court decision precluding the search of a cell phone as an automatic part of “search incident to arrest” doctrine, Riley v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
 The Supreme Court has held firm that there is a strong boundary between privacy and security, upholding the strength of the Fourth Amendment with limitations (Riley v California) . [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:23 am
Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit 1978) (government arranged for `mail cover,’ under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
As to her remaining failure-to-promote claims under both laws, she either lacked evidence to establish a prima facie case or failed to raise an issue with respect to pretext, because she could not show that she was clearly better qualified than the persons chosen (Riley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am by Rishabh Bhandari, David Hopen
The attacker, who wounded 15 people, arrived in Germany two years ago as an asylum-seeker and had faced deportation to Bulgaria following repeated trouble with the police. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
Approximately 2,000 people are hospitalized, and 60 people die as a direct result of E. coli O157:H7 infections and complications. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:01 am by Orin Kerr
Choate, 576 F2d 165, 174-177 (9th Cir. 1978) (government arranged for “mail cover,” under which postal service provided government agency with information appearing on the face of envelopes or packages addressed to defendant); People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 8:03 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Riley Spam Arrest’s Sender Agreement Fails Because Email Marketer’s Employees Lacked Authority–Spam Arrest v. [read post]