Search for: "People v. Riley" Results 241 - 260 of 460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Governing people to people relations is a very different thing from state undermining personhood by criminalizing dancing. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
, heard 15 and 16 June 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 M [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
The Supreme Court has granted certiorari to address the issue in Wurie and a similar case, People v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm by Patrick@nimblelight.com
However, it is crucial to remember that the police need search warrants to search the cell phones of people they arrest, as per the Supreme Court ruling in Riley v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
 The Supreme Court has held firm that there is a strong boundary between privacy and security, upholding the strength of the Fourth Amendment with limitations (Riley v California) . [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:21 am by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
The petitioner sought to suppress all of the evidence seized around the time of the arrest, relying on the decision in Riley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:59 am by Ezra Rosser
Lee, https://www.swlaw.edu/sites/default/files/2023-08/Article%201_Lee%20Foreword%20%28updated%29.pdf Reflections on Place and People from Within (PDF) M. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Two energy companies have also been fined £250,000 by the ICO for bombarding people and businesses on the ‘do not call register’ with unsolicited marketing calls. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a plan for a gradual ease of the lock down and a new phase which will see more businesses reopening and people gradually returning to work. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am by Benjamin Pollard
Chris Riley and Susan Ness argued that modularity is the best possible path toward creating a global internet with platform accountability. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]