Search for: "People v. Rivera (1981)"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2019, 2:56 pm
From yesterday's opinion by Judge John Segal in Jenni Rivera Enterps., LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
Our standard for judging whether a verdict is legally repugnant was articulated in 1981 in People v Tucker (55 NY2d 1). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Boomer, 736 S.E.2d 724, 733 (Va. 2013); Rivera v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Rivera, 174 F.Supp.2d 1097, 1110. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Rivera, 174 F.Supp.2d 1097, 1110. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:35 am
"[H]aving deliberately availed himself of his right to remain silent, the defendant's failure to give a more complete exculpatory statement to the police 'may simply [have been] attributable to his awareness that he [was] under no obligation to speak' to the police, including to implicate his friend in a shooting, and to his knowledge that his decision not to speak would not be used against him at trial," the majority said in an unsigned opinion, citing the 1981… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
