Search for: "People v. Roberts" Results 21 - 40 of 7,507
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
Clearview AI, a 2020 lawsuit alleging violation of Illinois residents’ privacy rights under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act  EFF’s amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Sidar, written by Judge Toby Heytens and joined by Judges Robert Bruce King and J. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Zoe Ingenhaag, Lexology: Gender critical beliefs in the workplace: on Phoenix v The Open University, Meade v Westminster City Council and Anor and Ali v Reason & Nott. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am by INFORRM
Roberts was quick to respond to Texas and Florida: “The First Amendment restricts what the government can do, and what the government’s doing here is saying you must do this, you must carry these people. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am by admin
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(In contrast, we have long backed an amendment to overturn Buckley v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
Nicholas Leicester [2024] ECC Lei 2 This judgment (which was preceded by three interim judgments with the neutral citations [2023] ECC Lei 1, [2023] ECC Lei 2 and [2023] ECC Lei 3, dealing with preliminary issues) relates to a petition for the introduction of a new altar frontal displaying the colours of the Progress Pride flag, the church having come to be regarded over time as a safe worshipping space for LGBTQIA+ people of faith. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]