Search for: "People v. Robinson" Results 41 - 60 of 739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Robinson, Center for Health Decision Science; Craig Thornton, Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis; and W. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case once again shows how qualified immunity works in police misconduct cases.The case is Williams v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 6:44 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Here, the excessive force claim will go to trial, but the false arrest is dismissed on immunity grounds.The case is Williams v. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
This proportion was significantly higher than results from a survey of healthy people, in which 24% reported eating frozen berries in the week before they were interviewed. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"Most of Freeman’s allegations concern acts done by people other than Perticone and Romeo. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
Fox’s co-host Calvin Robinson was also fired after voicing support for the actor. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The authors have conducted the first national study of workplace violence against young people in our country. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 6:07 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court also provides interesting analysis on what constitutes an adverse action under Title VII.The case is Banks v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Consequently, absences for ART treatment can still be dealt with in the same way as other forms of illness absence without being discriminatory (London Borough of Greenwich v Robinson (unreported; [1995] UKEAT 745)). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm by Orin S. Kerr
The legitimate subjective and objective reasonable expectation of privacy that people have in their electronically stored data should not be so easily defeated. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:13 am by Rick Garnett
It animated his final Religion Clauses opinion, a 2022 dissent in Carson v. [read post]