Search for: "People v. Rodgers" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2016, 8:55 am
Barr and Rodgers were seriously injured, but survived. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:05 am
The case Midwest Biohazard Services, LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:12 pm
On the theory that a decent number of people out at 3:30 a.m. in such an area are up to no good.  [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
Background In March 2012, Mr Khuja was one of a number of people arrested on suspicion of committing sexual offences against children in the Oxford area. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Crossing to join his four liberal colleagues, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion in yesterday’s Davis v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
Background In March 2012, Mr Khuja was one of a number of people arrested on suspicion of committing sexual offences against children in the Oxford area. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 4:03 am by INFORRM
In the case of Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864 (QB) Males J held that the right of a claimant to name the people who abused her prevailed over the rights of the perpetrators and others to private and family life. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:30 am by Adam Wagner
Homosexuals are as much entitled to freedom of association with others of the same sexual orientation, and to freedom of self-expression in matters that affect their sexuality, as people who are straight [paras [11] and [14] per Lord Hope and para [78] per Lord Rodger]. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am by Rodger Citron
”  Congress and the President—who are directly elected by the people—develop policy. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
The Court of Appeal yesterday handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am by INFORRM
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Lord Rodger agrees with Lords Hope and Walker, with nothing further. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am by Aimee Denholm
The minority, take the view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
A criminal investigation counts (see, United States v Rodgers, 466 US 475 [1984]). [read post]