Search for: "People v. Rodgers" Results 41 - 60 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 6:01 am by charonqc
Supreme court changes fair comment defence in libel cases Guardian: Lord Phillips says that key test for defending libel cases should be changed to ‘honest comment’ in light of new technology Spiller and another (Appellants) v Joseph and others (Respondents) [2010] UKSC 53 On appeal from the Court of Appeal [2009] EWCA Civ 1075 JUSTICES: Lord Phillips (President), Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Brown and Sir John Dyson SCJ JUDGMENT The Supreme Court unanimously allows the… [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:40 am by Charlie Tomlinson, Olswang LLP
Lord Neuberger then considered the press’ interest in knowing the identity of anonymous authors and quoted Lord Rodger in In re Guardian and Media Ltd & Ors [2010] UKSC 1: “What’s in a name? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:48 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Currently, playlisters are people who create playlists that users follow. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
”   [1] These are only two videos of several, linked here simply to provide some context from people who are more deeply ingrained with the music and the law surrounding the Gray v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Rodgers, 12-382, concerns the “clearly established” standard in Section 2254(d), asking whether Faretta v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Because it's almost inevitable - rummage through enough documents and emails of enough people (a quarter million or so will do) and eventually you're very likely to discover somebody saying, or doing, or proposing something dumb. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by Steve Hall
The case echoes the dispute involved in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 1:32 am by CMS
  Unlike the primary focus of this Blog, it deals not with the appeals the court hears, but with the behaviour of the people at the heart of decision-making in the Court: the UKSC Justices. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:13 pm by charonqc
The restriction confirmed by the courts in Whaley v Lord Watson 2000 (later confirmed by the House of lords). [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 2:08 pm by fvanloon
The FBI failed to respond, while the Justice Department claimed to find no records of communications between Strzok and Ohr (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm by Chuck Cosson
As the Council of Europe authors found, “[t]he most ‘successful’ of problematic content is that which plays on people’s emotions, encouraging feelings of superiority, anger or fear. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  As I have argued elsewhere, it is one thing to repeat the injunction “let justice be done though the heavens fall,” even if one doubts that many people are really willing to adhere to the precept. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The project did not set out to revise the rules of record management or privacy or to tell people how long they should keep their records or in what form. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm by Jim Sedor
“I’ve never worried a whole lot about what people think,&r [read post]