Search for: "People v. Rodriguez"
Results 481 - 500
of 602
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2010, 6:59 am
Rafael RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.2010 WL 3909902, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.,2010. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:06 am
California, 386 U.S. 738 1967; People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm
As the Court held in People v Lyon, AD3d, 2010 NY Slip Op 06892 [10/01/10], where "a defendant's testimony conflicts with evidence precluded by a Sandoval ruling, "the defense opens the door' on the issue in question, and the [defendant] is properly subject to impeachment by the prosecution's use of the otherwise precluded evidence" (People v Fardan, 82 NY2d 638, 646; see People v Rodriguez, 85 NY2d 586,… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 12:46 pm
The case, Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 8:28 am
People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:07 pm
We generally don't deport people on the basis of having a tiny amount of marijuana for personal use.But the Ninth Circuit holds that this rule doesn't help Dan Rodriguez. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 4:18 pm
Rodriguez (M.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Rodriguez (San Diego, CA)Kruger v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:20 am
Bell won in State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:19 am
People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:04 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:09 pm
Third Circuit drop-kicks “spygate” football-fan class action against New England Patriots [Cal Civil Justice, Russell Jackson, earlier] “Watch Those ‘Jury Duty’ Tweets, People” [Lowering the Bar] Ninth Circuit Kozinski-O’Connor-Ikuta panel rules for free speech in big “hostile environment” workplace-discrimination case [Volokh first, second and third posts; Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:31 pm
Ford v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:01 pm
See R.A.V. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:37 pm
For instance, in Truax v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 1:06 pm
” Gitlow, 268 U.S. at 672 (Holmes, J., dissenting); see also Meyer v. [read post]
