Search for: "People v. Rodriguez"
Results 541 - 560
of 601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2008, 7:44 am
The case is People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
Together, Rodriguez and Miliken made Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:15 am
As sankyu correctly pointed out, the case I wrote about in the post - People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Rodriguez, 2007 WL 2408484 (S. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Recently, on September 8, 2008, I commented on People v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Cruz-Rodriguez, No. 052492, 052493 Convictions and sentences of twenty-six defendants for crimes arising from their involvement in a large drug distribution network that operated in a Puerto Rico housing project are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient; 2) the evidence failed to implicate one defendant in any conspiracy; 3) the evidence implicated a defendant in a conspiracy different from the one charged; and 4) district court committed a host of errors,… [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 04, 2008 US v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 6:41 pm
Recently, in People v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 5:50 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:54 pm
Rodriguez, 2008 WL 2756476 (Cal. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
People v Salcido, June 30, 2008. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
Afterall, given the racial disparities between the jury panels and the population of defendants, the defense doesn't just exercise its strikes to exclude people from the jury, it also uses strikes strategically in order to include particular people. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:36 am
Rodriguez, Elektra v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-2656 Sentencing courts have discretion to consider items such as fast-track disparity in considering requests for variant sentences premised on disagreements with the manner in which the sentencing guidelines operate, however, they are not obligated to deviate from the guidelines based on those items. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
Rodriguez may make this point. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:37 am
US v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:47 pm
US v. [read post]
