Search for: "People v. Rodriguez"
Results 561 - 580
of 614
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2008, 5:50 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 am
See Elektra v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 6:54 pm
Rodriguez, 2008 WL 2756476 (Cal. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:22 pm
People v Salcido, June 30, 2008. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 5:06 pm
Afterall, given the racial disparities between the jury panels and the population of defendants, the defense doesn't just exercise its strikes to exclude people from the jury, it also uses strikes strategically in order to include particular people. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:36 am
Rodriguez, Elektra v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-2656 Sentencing courts have discretion to consider items such as fast-track disparity in considering requests for variant sentences premised on disagreements with the manner in which the sentencing guidelines operate, however, they are not obligated to deviate from the guidelines based on those items. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
Rodriguez may make this point. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:37 am
US v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 12:47 pm
US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
I doubt I will be quite so prolific this week as I am going to be back on a suppression hearing on Tuesday and maybe Wednesday in People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 6:24 am
Viscovich of Queens Civil in Northern Medical P.C., a/a/o Jose Rodriguez, v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:14 am
Kerr says that Weinstein's ruling---insofar as it anticipates that the Supreme Court would overrule an old decision based on the rationales of newer cases---violates the rule laid down by the Supreme Court in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Rodriguez or Atlantic v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:37 am
Rodriguez). [read post]
