Search for: "People v. Rodriquez"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2008, 1:51 pm
Rodriquez (06-1646) and Begay v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:17 am
Ayala Rodriquez v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:21 am
People v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 8:59 am
Under HIPAA providers are required to give people certain information about how their healthcare data has been shared. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm
On Monday, in a 4 to 3 ruling, the California Supreme Court held that these sentences were unconstitutional (People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
Roberts * Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:36 am
Manual Rodriquez ;The People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:34 am
Kenneth Rodriquez
Subscription Required
BRONX COUNTYCriminal Practice
Defendant Fails to Meet Burden of Showing Counsel Failed to Relay on Plea Offer and Advice
People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Atlanta Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:46 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
Atlanta Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:02 pm
In support of this argument, the People rely on People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
This question — whether courts should revisit jury verdicts when presented with proof of racial bias by a juror in decision-making — was answered with a resounding yes earlier this year in the Supreme Court case, Pena-Rodriquez v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:30 am
" Rodriquez v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 9:45 am
Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
Rodriquez, 187 Wash.App. 922, 352 P.3d 200, review denied, 184 Wash.2d 1011, 360 P.3d 817 (Washington Supreme Court 2015).State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:51 am
The Supreme Court breached the “sanctity” of the jury room in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]