Search for: "People v. Rodriquez" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2013, 8:59 am by Tammy Schroeder
   Under HIPAA providers are required to give people certain information about how their healthcare data has been shared. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm by Kym Stapleton
  On Monday, in a 4 to 3 ruling, the California Supreme Court held that these sentences were unconstitutional (People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 2:00 pm
This question — whether courts should revisit jury verdicts when presented with proof of racial bias by a juror in decision-making — was answered with a resounding yes earlier this year in the Supreme Court case, Pena-Rodriquez v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:59 am
Rodriquez, 187 Wash.App. 922, 352 P.3d 200, review denied, 184 Wash.2d 1011, 360 P.3d 817 (Washington Supreme Court 2015).State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:51 am by SHG
The Supreme Court breached the “sanctity” of the jury room in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am by Richard Hunt
The people getting sued under the disability rights provisions of the ADA and FHA were not evil; they were negligent. [read post]