Search for: "People v. Rogers" Results 1 - 20 of 1,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
How many votes do you think serial killer Glen Rogers gets in his bid to overturn his death sentence? [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:40 pm
District Judge Roger Vinson ... said the case would continue as scheduled. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
utm_term=.e26cdbdc081bOf interest to patent people, Taney was in the dissenting four in Winans v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:45 pm
People believe what I say as an analyst. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm by Jeanne Charn
People in court with family disputes make up the largest single category of users of free legal asisstance, not only in the United States but in all peer nations (most with legal aid programs significantly more generous than ours). [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 12:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Drape Creative, 909 F.3d 257 (9th Cir. 2018), the Honey Badger case, the Ninth Circuit began a process that could make Rogers v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
The police get a report of a person who's been missing for around a month. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm by Victoria VanBuren
 See our Part I in the series below and look for Parts II to V over the next few weeks. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 12:52 pm
McNamee has accused four people of using HGH or steroids: Clemens, Andy Pettite, Chuck Knoblack, and Debbie Clemens (Roger's wife). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:26 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Lopez (_NY3d_, 2011 NY Slip Op 01316 [2/22/11]) the Court of Appeal, considerered whether the right to counsel, as set forth in People v Rogers (48 NY2d 167 [1979]), was violated by police interrogation of a defendant in custody in Pennsylvania pending prosecution on Pennsylvania charges, who wasrepresented by a Pennsylvania attorney who had entered that case was lawful where the police, where the police, having never asked, did not knwo that… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:15 am
It should not surprise anyone that in People v Durand (2009 NY Slip Op 04476 4th Dept 6/5/09) the Court held that under New York law it was error for the lower court to have considered "the counts of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny, of which defendant was acquitted, when imposing the sentences on the criminal trespass counts (see People v Reeder, 298 AD2d 468, lv denied 99 NY2d 538; see also People v Rogers, 56 AD3d… [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 1:51 pm
  But I can summarize the one point on which they all agree in a single sentence:"Are we seriously appointing lawyers to defend people in death penalty cases who passed the bar four months ago?! [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm by Luke Rioux
In summary, they raised the following points:Diminished capacity was first recognized as a defense in 1973 by People v. [read post]